Detection of early cleavage embryos improves pregnancy and delivery rates of Day 3 embryo transfer during in vitro fertilization

1Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective This study established a simple criterion for improving the pregnancy and delivery rates of Day 3 embryo transfer for in vitro fertilization (IVF) by assessing the early cleavage of two-cell stage embryos. Materials and Methods In total, 258 cycle patients undergoing an IVF and Day 3 embryo transfer program were recruited. All cycles were divided into four groups containing viable Day 3 embryos and those (A) with distinct early cleavage (equal-sized blastomeres and ≤10% fragmentation: ECA grade); (B) with indistinct early cleavage (equal sized blastomeres, >2 blastomeres, or >10% fragmentation: ECB grade); (C) without early cleavage [no early cleavage (NEC grade)]; or (D) without early cleavage being assessed (control) at 25–27 after insemination. Results The percentage of viable Day 3 embryos from ECA grade (75.1%, 507/675) was significantly higher than that from ECB grade (19.2%, 151/403) or NEC grade (27.1%, 127/469) embryos (p < 0.01). The pregnancy and delivery rates in the ECA group [65.7% (65/990) and 48.5% (48/990), respectively] were significantly higher than those in the ECB group [30.8% (4/13) and 7.7% (1/13), respectively] or NEC group [36.8% (14/38) and 23.7% (9/38), respectively; all p < 0.01]. The implantation rate in the ECA group (32.3%, 129/400) was higher than those in the ECB (6.8%, 4/59) and NEC (13.0%, 18/136) groups (p < 0.01). Conclusion Simple selection using the early cleavage morphology may improve the pregnancy and delivery rates of Day 3 embryo transfer programs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lee, C. I., Lee, T. H., Huang, C. C., Chen, H. H., Liu, C. H., & Lee, M. S. (2016). Detection of early cleavage embryos improves pregnancy and delivery rates of Day 3 embryo transfer during in vitro fertilization. Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 55(4), 558–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjog.2016.06.005

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free