Uncertainty comparison of visual sensing in adverse weather conditions

6Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper focuses on flood-region detection using monitoring images. However, adverse weather affects the outcome of image segmentation methods. In this paper, we present an experimental comparison of an outdoor visual sensing system using region-growing methods with two different growing rules-namely, GrowCut and RegGro. For each growing rule, several tests on adverse weather and lens-stained scenes were performed, taking into account and analyzing different weather conditions with the outdoor visual sensing system. The influence of several weather conditions was analyzed, highlighting their effect on the outdoor visual sensing system with different growing rules. Furthermore, experimental errors and uncertainties obtained with the growing rules were compared. The segmentation accuracy of flood regions yielded by the GrowCut, RegGro, and hybrid methods was 75%, 85%, and 87.7%, respectively.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lo, S. W., Wu, J. H., Chen, L. C., Tseng, C. H., Lin, F. P., & Hsu, C. H. (2016). Uncertainty comparison of visual sensing in adverse weather conditions. Sensors (Switzerland), 16(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/s16071125

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free