Critical education, generative artificial intelligence and the tyranny of freedom: a critique of modern ‘technocracy’

8Citations
Citations of this article
48Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This paper provides a critical analysis of Gen-AI technologies, questioning their role as the liberators of learning. Much has already been written about Gen-AI, but little has been said regarding its purported temporal efficiency as a tool of intellectual freedom. This paper casts doubt on the value of this efficiency, delivering a critique of Gen-AI technological freedom as a dubious virtue at best, a form of freedom that offers little to the development of critical learning and reasoning capacities. This critique is grounded in a Freirean approach to critical education, one that understands the concept of learner freedom or learner autonomy as a socially constructed and collective endeavour. The paper outlines this position by discussing key elements of Freire’s thinking, including notions of problematisation, critical dialogue and acts of knowing. It concludes by suggesting potential alternatives to what Freire called the ‘tyranny of freedom’ in the application of educational technologies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Costa, C., & Murphy, M. (2026). Critical education, generative artificial intelligence and the tyranny of freedom: a critique of modern ‘technocracy.’ Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 35(3), 547–563. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2025.2547728

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free