Skip to main content

Public accountability practices of district health management teams: a realist inquiry in two local health systems in Ghana

  • Van Belle S
  • Mayhew S
Citations of this article
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This artice is free to access.


In today's local health systems in low- and middle-income countries, district health management teams, together with local authorities, bear the responsibility for health sector performance. This infers not only a responsibility for coordination of the multiple actors in pluralistic health systems and the organisation of services and programmes, but also for ensuring accountability towards the population. This explorative study appraised actual public accountability practices of district health management teams in two local health systems in Ghana and explored how these could be improved. We used a comparative case study design based on realist inquiry principles. An initial middle range theory was developed on the basis of a literature review of governance and accountability spanning different social science research traditions. It was tested in one urban and one rural health system. Data collection included in-depth interviews, informal discussions, and review of documents, reports and routine data. In both districts, the health management teams had strong upward accountability systems through which they accounted to the regional and central level authorities of the Ghana Health Service. This accountability was enforced by command-and-control mechanisms such as centrally set priorities and planning directives, audits and performance reviews. In the rural local health system, the district health management team had strong horizontal accountability practices towards the District Assembly and INGOs with whom they collaborate in health service delivery programmes. These relations were based on shared interests and reciprocity. However, in both sites, public accountability strategies were found to be virtually absent. Apart from complaint boxes, there were no formal channels of communication nor for participation of the public in local priority-setting and performance assessment. As a result, none of the district health management teams achieved full public accountability. The study identified ways to improve public accountability. First, there is a critical need for more transparency and information sharing with the public. Existing performance appraisals, for instance, should be open to public representatives. Public accountability practices should be enforced by a 'meta-governor' (Bell and Hindmoor, 2009), recognised in this role by all other actors, capable of overseeing local health system governance.




Van Belle, S., & Mayhew, S. H. (2014). Public accountability practices of district health management teams: a realist inquiry in two local health systems in Ghana. BMC Health Services Research, 14(S2).

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free