Examining the Ethics and Impacts of Laws Restricting Transgender Youth-Athlete Participation

1Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

As of this writing, twenty-one states have passed laws barring transgender youth-athletes from competing on public-school sports teams in accordance with their gender identity. Proponents of these regulations claim that transgender females in particular have inherent physiological advantages that threaten a “level playing field” for their cisgender competitors. Existing evidence is limited but does not support these restrictions. Gathering more robust data will require allowing transgender youth to compete (rather than preemptively barring them), but even if trans females are shown to retain some advantage, this would not have greater moral significance than the many other “fair” physical and economic advantages found across sports. These regulations deprive transgender youth, an exceptionally vulnerable population, from the vast physical, mental, and social benefits of sports. While we advocate for transgender inclusion under our current, gender-segregated model of sport, we propose changes to the overarching structure that would promote a more inclusive and fairer athletic environment.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Moyer, V., Zink, A., & Parent, B. (2023). Examining the Ethics and Impacts of Laws Restricting Transgender Youth-Athlete Participation. Hastings Center Report, 53(3), 6–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.1484

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free