The purpose of this applied research was to determine the Color Managed Digital Printing Workflow (CMDPW) consistency (4th C of the color management) over a period of time [100 days, (N = 100)]. The quality of digital color printing is determined by these influential factors: screening method applied, type of printing process, calibration method, device profile, ink (dry-toner or liquid-toner), printer resolution and the substrate (paper). For this research, only the color printing attributes such as the overall average color deviation [ACD, ΔE(2000)] and the solid ink density (SID) were analyzed to examine the CMDPW process consistency in a day-today digital printing operation. These are the color attributes which are monitored and managed for quality accuracy during the printing. Printed colors of the random sample size (n = 80) were measured against the GRACoL2013 standards to derive the colorimetric/densitometric values. Reference colorimetric values used in the analysis were the threshold deviations (acceptable color deviations) as outlined in the ISO12647-7 standards (GRACoL2013). A control charts analysis was applied for further determining the process (CMDPW) SID and ACD variation. The data collected were run through multiple software applications (MS-Excel/SPSS/Minitab) to apply various statistical methods. Analyzed data from the experiment revealed that the printed colorimetric values were in match (aligned) with the GRACoL 2013 (reference/target). Since the SID values of CMYK colors were in control throughout the process, this enabled the CMDPW to produce consistent acceptable color deviation (Average Printed ΔE(2000)= 2.978; SD = 0.437; Acceptable Threshold color deviation is ΔE(2000)≤ 3.00).
CITATION STYLE
Dharavath, H. N. (2021). Statistical evaluation of a Color Managed Digital Printing Workflow (CMDPW) consistency [4th C of CMW]. Journal of Graphic Engineering and Design, 12(4), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.24867/JGED-2021-4-017
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.