Differences in Electrochemistry between Fibrous SPAN and Fibrous S/C Cathodes Relevant to Cycle Stability and Capacity

  • Warneke S
  • Eusterholz M
  • Zenn R
  • et al.
33Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

© The Author(s) 2017. Two different Li/S cathodes are compared in terms of capacity (mA.h.gsulfur-1 ) and intermediates during discharge and charge. One cathode material is based on fibrous SPAN, a sulfur-containing material obtained via the thermal conversion of poly(acrylonitrile), PAN, in the presence of sulfur. In this material, sulfur is covalently bound to the polymeric backbone. The second cathode material is based on porous activated carbon fibers (ACFs) with elemental sulfur embedded inside the ACFs' micropores. Cyclic voltammetry clearly indicates different discharge and charge chemistry of the two materials. While S-containing ACFs show the expected redoxchemistry of sulfur, SPAN does not form long-chain polysulfides during discharge; instead, sulfide is chopped off the polymer-bound sulfur chains to directly form Li2S. The high reversibility of this process accounts for both the high cycle stability and capacity of SPAN-based cathode materials.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Warneke, S., Eusterholz, M., Zenn, R. K., Hintennach, A., Dinnebier, R. E., & Buchmeiser, M. R. (2018). Differences in Electrochemistry between Fibrous SPAN and Fibrous S/C Cathodes Relevant to Cycle Stability and Capacity. Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 165(1), A6017–A6020. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0061801jes

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free