The dynamic response of PEM fuel cells to changes in load

93Citations
Citations of this article
51Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The dynamic response of the stirred tank reactor (STR) polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM) fuel cell has been explored over the temperature range of 35-105°C. When the fuel cell was operated in the autohumidification mode the fuel cell current "ignited" when the I membrane water content was greater than a critical level of ∼1.6 H2O/SO3, and it extinguished when the initial membrane water content I was below this critical level. Above 70°C, two stable "ignited" states were observed at intermediate load resistances; these steady states corresponded to different levels of membrane hydration. At low load resistances only a single ignited steady state was observed with high membrane hydration, and at high load resistances only a single ignited steady state was observed with intermediate membrane hydration. Hysteresis between the two ignited states was observed; the steady state selected depended on the initial conditions in the fuel cell. The time constant for the fuel cell current to reach steady state after a change in the load resistance was ∼ 103-104 s. Below 70°C only one "ignited" state and the extinguished state were observed in the autohumidification fuel cell. After 3000h of operation the STR PEM fuel cell current and effluent relative humidities oscillated autonomously between two membrane hydration states with a period of oscillation of ∼10,000 s. The oscillations showed abrupt transitions indicative of a capacitive switch. These complex dynamics of PEM fuel cell operation are associated with the membrane water uptake. It is hypothesized that water produced and swells the membrane, altering the interfacial membrane-electrode contact. © 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Benziger, J., Chia, E., Moxley, J. F., & Kevrekidis, I. G. (2005). The dynamic response of PEM fuel cells to changes in load. Chemical Engineering Science, 60(6), 1743–1759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2004.10.033

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free