Researchers are still searching for the ways to identify different categories of employees according to their exposure to negative acts and psychological experience of workplace bullying. We followed Notelaers and Einarsen's application of the ROC analysis to determine the NAQ-R cut-offscores applying a "lower" and "higher" threshold. The main goal of this research was to develop and test different gold standards of personal and organizational relevance in determining the NAQ-R cut-offscores in a specific cultural and economic context of Serbia. Apart from combining self-labeling as a victim with self-perceived health, the objectives were to test the gold standards developed as a combination of self-labeling with life satisfaction, self-labeling with intention to leave and a complex gold standard based on self-labeling, self-perceived health, life satisfaction and intention to leave taken together. The ROC analysis on Serbian workforce data supports applying of different gold standards. For identifying employees in a preliminary stage of bullying, the most applicable was the gold standard based on self-labeling and intention to leave (score 34 and higher). The most accurate identification of victims could be based on the most complex gold standard (score 81 and higher). This research encourages further investigation of gold standards in different cultures.
CITATION STYLE
Petrović, I. B., Vukelić, M., & Čizmić, S. (2017). Rocking at 81 and rolling at 34: ROC cut-offscores for the negative acts questionnaire-revised in Serbia. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(JAN). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02058
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.