Skip to main content

Clinical and biological activity of soy protein powder supplementation in healthy male volunteers

11Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: To determine if a commonly used soy protein supplement exhibits biological activity in vivo and in vitro, we evaluated an over-the-counter soy protein powder supplement using blood from healthy male volunteers and in an estrogen receptor in vitro assay. Subjects and Methods: We recruited healthy male volunteers 18 years of age or older that were in good health. Treatment consisted of consuming two scoops (56 g) of pure soy protein powder (Puritan's Pride, Oakdale, NY) daily for 28 days. Serum testosterone and luteinizing hormone (LH) levels were collected on days -7, 0, 14, and 28 of therapy, and day 42. A reporter estrogen receptor (ER) assay was used to determine the effect on ER-β and ER-α in vitro. Results: Twelve subjects were enrolled with a mean age of 32.25 years (range 25 to 47). Serum testosterone decreased 19%(±22%) during the 4-week use of soy protein powder (P = 0.021) and increased within 2 weeks after we discontinued soy protein powder. Serum LH concentrations decreased during the 4-week use of soy protein powder then increased within 2 weeks after we stopped the soy protein powder, but the changes did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.20). Soy protein powder was found to induce agonist activity to ER-β using a reporter estrogen receptor assay in yeast. Conclusion: Soy protein powder decreases serum testosterone levels in healthy men and acts as an ER-β agonist; the significance of this biological effect with respect to cancer prevention needs further study. Copyright © 2007 American Association for Cancer Research.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Goodin, S., Shen, F., Shih, W. J., Dave, N., Kane, M. P., Medina, P., … DiPaola, R. S. (2007). Clinical and biological activity of soy protein powder supplementation in healthy male volunteers. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention, 16(4), 829–833. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0882

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free