Diagnostic and Treatment Concordance Among Primary Care Doctors Delivering Mental Health Care: Results from an Effectiveness–implementation Hybrid Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of an “Add-on Online Mental Health Training”

3Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Training primary care doctors (PCDs) to manage common psychiatric conditions is seen as a key strategy to reduce the treatment gap, but its effects on their diagnostic and treatment skills remain largely unstudied. Methods: A hybrid cluster randomized controlled trial compared two PCD training methods: training as usual (TAU; two days of in-person lectures, control group [CG]) versus TAU plus online mental health training (OMHT; 18 hours of interactive modules, study group [SG]). Primary outcomes (diagnostic, treatment, and combined concordance) between PCDs and psychiatrists were evaluated using Cohen’s kappa (κ), with group comparisons made via paired t-test. Results: For identifying anxiety disorders, SG (κ = 0.41) performed better than CG (κ = 0.06; p = .02). Likewise, for somatization disorders, SG had moderate concordance (κ = 0.35), while CG had poor concordance (κ = 0.05; p < .01). For depressive disorders, SG had low concordance (κ = 0.12), while CG showed moderate concordance (κ = 0.58; p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jayashri S, Sabbella, C., Singh, S., Shah, H., Joshi, S., Samrudhi V, … Math, S. B. (2026). Diagnostic and Treatment Concordance Among Primary Care Doctors Delivering Mental Health Care: Results from an Effectiveness–implementation Hybrid Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of an “Add-on Online Mental Health Training.” Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 48(1), S24–S34. https://doi.org/10.1177/02537176251393412

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free