Abstract
Conjunctival inflammation assessment is fundamental for diagnosing and monitoring various ocular surface diseases. This review summarizes grading scales available for conjunctival inflammation, discussing both subjective and objective methodologies. Widely used clinical grading systems include slit-lamp findings classification scale, Mandell scale for conjunctival injection, McMonnies and Champman-Davies scale, CCLRU (Cornea and Contact Lens Research Unit) scale, Efron scale, and VBR (validated bulbar redness) scale. They provide standardized frameworks for assessing conjunctival hyperemia and inflammation severity. However, these subjective methods are limited by inter-observer variability and lack of precision in detecting subtle changes. Recent technological advances have introduced objective digital imaging systems and automated algorithms that may offer improved reproducibility and sensitivity. Novel approaches include the integration of artificial intelligence for automated assessment. The validation of these scales across diverse patient populations has demonstrated varying degrees of reliability and clinical utility. Current evidence suggests that while traditional subjective scales remain clinically relevant, objective measurement systems provide superior repeatability and may better serve research applications requiring precise quantification of inflammatory changes. This review summarizes current knowledge regarding conjunctival inflammation grading methodologies and provides insights into novel developments in the field.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Anghelache-Dobrescu, A. E., Toma, M. E., Bucșan, R. G., Garhöfer, G., Popa-Cherecheanu, A., Schmetterer, L., & Gheorghe, A. G. (2025, December 1). Grading Scales of Conjunctival Inflammation. Diagnostics. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15243200
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.