Use of alternative medicine for cancer and its impact on survival

215Citations
Citations of this article
490Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

There is limited available information on patterns of utilization and efficacy of alternative medicine (AM) for patients with cancer. We identified 281 patients with nonmetastatic breast, prostate, lung, or colorectal cancer who chose AM, administered as sole anticancer treatment among patients who did not receive conventional cancer treatment (CCT), defined as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, surgery, and/or hormone therapy. Independent covariates on multivariable logistic regression associated with increased likelihood of AM use included breast or lung cancer, higher socioeconomic status, Intermountain West or Pacific location, stage II or III disease, and low comorbidity score. Following 2:1 matching (CCT ¼ 560 patients and AM ¼ 280 patients) on Cox proportional hazards regression, AM use was independently associated with greater risk of death compared with CCT overall (hazard ratio [HR] ¼ 2.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] ¼ 1.88 to 3.27) and in subgroups with breast (HR ¼ 5.68, 95% CI ¼ 3.22 to 10.04), lung (HR ¼ 2.17, 95% CI ¼ 1.42 to 3.32), and colorectal cancer (HR ¼ 4.57, 95% CI ¼ 1.66 to 12.61). Although rare, AM utilization for curable cancer without any CCT is associated with greater risk of death.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Johnson, S. B., Park, H. S., Gross, C. P., & Yu, J. B. (2018). Use of alternative medicine for cancer and its impact on survival. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 110(1), 121–124. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djx145

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free