Resistance training and inter-interindividual response differences on cardiorespiratory fitness in older adults: An ancillary meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

1Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Examine true inter-individual response differences (IIRD) as a result of resistance training on cardiorespiratory fitness in older adults. Data from a recent meta-analysis of 22 randomized controlled trials representing 552 men and women (292 resistance training, 260 control) ≥ 60 years of age were included. The primary outcome was cardiorespiratory fitness (VO2max) in ml.kg−1.min−1. Using the inverse variance heterogeneity (IVhet) model, statistically significant treatment effect (resistance training minus control) increases in VO2max in ml.kg−1.min−1 were found (mean, 1.8, 95% CI, 0.4 to 3.3 ml.kg−1.min−1, p = 0.01; Q = 82.8, p < 0.001; I2= 74.6%, 95% CI, 61.6 to 83.3%; (Formula presented.) =1.1). The 95% prediction interval (PI) was −0.8 to 4.5 ml.kg−1.min−1. However, no statistically significant IIRD was observed (mean, 0.6, 95% CI, −1.1 to 1.4 ml.kg−1.min−1; (Formula presented.) =1.5). The 95% PI was −1.8 to 2.0 ml.kg−1.min−1. In conclusion, while progressive resistance training may increase VO2max in ml.kg−1.min−1, a lack of true resistance-training-associated IIRD exist.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kelley, G. A., Kelley, K. S., & Stauffer, B. L. (2024, January 1). Resistance training and inter-interindividual response differences on cardiorespiratory fitness in older adults: An ancillary meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Science Progress. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1177/00368504241227088

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free