Factores asociados a la no realización de la esterilización quirúrgica en mujeres gran multíparas de la serranía peruana, 2017.

0Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: Determine sociodemographic characteristics, gynecological-obstetric history, perception and previous knowledge associated with not performing surgical sterilization in large multiparous women admitted to a hospital in the province of Huancayo. Materials and Methods: A quantitative, prospective and cross-sectional study, was carried out on large multiparous women hospitalized in the gynecology and obstetrics services of the Regional Maternal and Child Teaching Hospital "El Carmen" of Huancayo; that met the inclusion criteria. A survey-type collection instrument was applied. A descriptive statistic was carried out, as well as the bivariate and multivariate analysis. Results: 73% of the women surveyed would not undergo surgical sterilization in the future, however, 90% would like to receive more information about it. The statistically significant factors associated with not performing surgical sterilization were: Not having used any contraceptive method previously (RPa: 1.35, 95% CI: 1.01-1.82, p: 0.042), not knowing if you want having more children (RPa: 1.58, 95% CI: 1.22-2.03, p <0.001), thinking that performing surgical sterilization would be against their rights (RPa: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.05-1.46; p: 0.008) and to think that surgical sterilization produces menstrual alterations (RPa: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.17-1.34, p: 0.027). Conclusions: Many women surveyed would not opt for surgical sterilization in the future due to various factors, many of them modifiable with adequate training and intervention of health personnel.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Samaniego, R. O., Verastegui-Díaz, A., & Mejia, C. R. (2019). Factores asociados a la no realización de la esterilización quirúrgica en mujeres gran multíparas de la serranía peruana, 2017. Revista Chilena de Obstetricia y Ginecologia, 84(1), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-75262019000100018

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free