Quantity and Quality Modeling of Groundwater by Conjugation of ANN and Co-Kriging Approaches

  • Nourani V
  • Goli R
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Today, groundwater is a major source of supply for domestic and agricultural purposes; especially in arid and semi arid regions. More water is being consumed to meet of a society whose population increases steadily. Worldwide, irrigated land has increased from 50 million ha in 1900 to 267 million ha in 2000 (Cay and Uyan, 2009). The climatic changes stemming from global warming also have negative effects on water resources. Both over exploitation from aquifers, and drought events have caused severe water table level drop in many areas. However, the level of groundwater has reduced remarkably in many areas, as a result of unconscious and excessive irrigation. Depletion of groundwater supplies, conflicts between groundwater and surface water users and potential for groundwater contamination are the main concerns that will become increasingly important as further aquifer development takes place in any basin. The natural chemical composition of groundwater is influenced predominantly by type and depth of soils and subsurface geological formations through which groundwater passes. Groundwater quality is also influenced by contribution from the atmosphere and surface water bodies. Quality of groundwater is also influenced by anthropogenic factors. For example, over exploitation of groundwater in coastal regions may result in sea water ingress and consequent increase in salinity of groundwater and excessive use of fertilizers and pesticides in agriculture and improper disposal of urban/industrial waste can cause contamination of groundwater resources. Groundwater systems possess features such as complexity, nonlinearity, being multi-scale and random, all governed by natural and/or anthropogenic factors, which complicate the dynamic predictions. Therefore many hydrological models have been developed to simulate this complex process. Models based on their involvement of physical characteristics generally fall into three main categories: black box models, conceptual models and physical based models (Nourani and Mano, 2007). The conceptual and physically based models are the main tools for predicting hydrological variables and understanding the physical processes that are taking place in a system. In these models, the internal physical processes are modeled in a simplified way. Even if not applying the exact differential laws of conservation, conceptual models attempt to describe large scale behavior of hydrological processes in a basin. However, these models require a large quantity of good quality data, sophisticated programs for calibration using rigorous optimization techniques and a detailed understanding of the underlying physical process. Because of the recognized limitations of these models and the growing need to properly manage overdeveloped groundwater systems, significant researches have been devoted to improve their predictive capabilities. Despite large investments in time and resources, prediction accuracy attainable with numerical flow models has not improved satisfactorily for many types of groundwater management problems. Studies on groundwater levels reveal spatial and temporal information on aquifers and aquiferous systems and help us to take appropriate measures. For management of groundwater resources, traditional numerical methods, with specific boundary conditions, are able to depict the complex structures of aquifers including complicated prediction of groundwater levels. However, the vast and accurate data required to run a numerical model are difficult to obtain owing to spatial variations and the unavailability of previous hydrogeology surveys. As a result, numerical methods have been restricted in their use in remote, sparsely monitored areas. If sufficient data are not available, and accurate predictions are more important than understanding the actual physics of the situation, black box models remain a good alternative method and can provide useful predictions without the costly calibration time (Daliakopoulos et al., 2005). In recent years, Artificial Neural Network (ANN) as a black box model has been widely used for forecasting in many areas of science and engineering. ANNs are proven to be effective in modeling virtually any nonlinear function to an arbitrary degree of accuracy. The main advantage of this approach over traditional methods is that the method does not require the complex nature of the underlying process under consideration to be explicitly described in mathematical form. This makes ANNs attractive tools for modeling water table fluctuations. The development of ANNs began approximately 70 years ago (McCulloch and Pitts, 1943), inspired by a desire to understand the human brain and emulate its behavior. Although the idea of ANNs was proposed by McCulloch and Pitts, the development of these techniques has experienced a renaissance only in the last decades due to Hopfield’s effort (Hopfield, 1982) in iterative auto-associable neural networks. A tremendous growth in the interest of this computational mechanism has occurred since Rumelhart et al. (1986) rediscovered a mathematically rigorous theoretical framework for neural networks, i.e., back propagation algorithm. Consequently, ANNs have found applications in many engineering problems. Since the early nineties, ANNs have been successfully used in environmental and hydrology-related areas such as rainfall-runoff modeling, stream flow forecasting, groundwater modeling, water quality, water management policy, precipitation forecasting, and reservoir operations (ASCE, 2000a,b). Also, ANN models have been used for rainfall- runoff modeling (Tayfur and Singh, 2006), precipitation forecasting and water quality modeling (Govindaraju and Ramachandra Rao, 2000). In the water level modeling context, Tayfur et al. (2005) presented an ANN model to predict water levels in piezometers placed in the body of an earthfill dam in Poland considering upstream and downstream water levels of the dam as input data. Neural networks have also been applied with success to temporal prediction of groundwater level (Coulibaly et al., 2001). Two researches have been carried out for forecasting floods in a karestic media (Beaudeau et al., 2001) and determining aquifer outflow influential parameters, and simulating aquifer outflow in a fissured media (Lallahem and Mania, 2003). ANNs have been successfully used for identifying the temporal data necessary to calculate groundwater level in only one piezometer (Lallahem et al., 2005). ANNs were also employed to solve complex groundwater problems and for predicting transient water level in a multilayer groundwater system under variable pumping states and climate conditions (Coppola et al., 2003). Coppola et al. (2005) developed an ANN model for accurately predicting potentiometric surface elevations in alluvial aquifers. Relationships among lake levels, rainfall, evapotranspiration and groundwater levels were determined by Dogan et al. (2008) using ANN-based models. Nourani et al. (2008) employed ANN approach for time-space modeling of groundwater level in an urbanized basin.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nourani, V., & Goli, R. (2012). Quantity and Quality Modeling of Groundwater by Conjugation of ANN and Co-Kriging Approaches. In Water Resources Management and Modeling. InTech. https://doi.org/10.5772/38912

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free