Skip to main content

Normobaric Hypoxia Reduces VO2 at Different Intensities in Highly Trained Runners

Citations of this article
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text


Introduction We sought to determine the effect of low and moderate normobaric hypoxia on oxygen consumption and anaerobic contribution during interval running at different exercise intensities. Methods Eight runners (age, 25 ± 7 yr, VO2max: 72.1 ± 5.6 mL·kg-1·min-1) completed three separate interval sessions at threshold (4 × 5 min, 2-min recovery), VO2max (8 × 90 s, 90-s recovery), and race pace (10 × 45 s, 1 min 45 s recovery) in each of; normoxia (elevation: 580 m, FiO2: 0.21), low (1400 m, 0.195) or moderate (2100 m, 0.18) normobaric hypoxia. The absolute running speed for each intensity was kept the same at each altitude to evaluate the effect of FiO2 on physiological responses. Expired gas was collected throughout each session, with total VO2 and accumulated oxygen deficit calculated. Data were compared using repeated-measures ANOVA. Results There were significant differences between training sessions for peak and total VO2, and anaerobic contribution (P < 0.001, P = 0.01 respectively), with race pace sessions eliciting the lowest and highest responses respectively. Compared to 580 m, total VO2 at 2100 m was significantly lower (P < 0.05), and anaerobic contribution significantly higher (P < 0.05) during both threshold and VO2max sessions. No significant differences were observed between altitudes for race pace sessions. Conclusions To maintain oxygen flux, completing acute exercise at threshold and VO2max intensity at 1400 m simulated altitude appears more beneficial compared with 2100 m. However, remaining at moderate altitude is a suitable when increasing the anaerobic contribution to exercise is a targeted response to training.




Sharma, A. P., Saunders, P. U., Garvican-Lewis, L. A., Clark, B., Gore, C. J., Thompson, K. G., & Périard, J. D. (2019). Normobaric Hypoxia Reduces VO2 at Different Intensities in Highly Trained Runners. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 51(1), 174–182.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free