Reclaiming discursive practices as an analytic focus: Political implications

197Citations
Citations of this article
223Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper has its genesis in concerns about the return to "the real" in social and political theory and analysis. This trend is linked to a reaction against the "linguistic turn", on the grounds that an exclusive focus on language undercuts political analysis by refusing to engage with "material reality". Foucault and "discourse" are common targets of this critique. Against this interpretation, the authors direct attention to the analytic and political usefulness of Foucault's concept of "discursive practices", which, it argues, has been much misunderstood. Discursive practices, as developed by Foucault, refers to the practices (or operations) of discourses, meaning knowledge formations, not to linguistic practices or language use. The focus is on how knowledge is produced through plural and contingent practices across different sites. Such an approach bridges a symbolic-material distinction and signals the always political nature of "the real". © Carol Bacchi and Jennifer Bonham 2014.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bacchi, C., & Bonham, J. (2014). Reclaiming discursive practices as an analytic focus: Political implications. Foucault Studies, (17), 173–192. https://doi.org/10.22439/fs.v0i17.4298

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free