Therapeutic value of a gastroenterology consultation in irritable bowel syndrome

21Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Functional patients comprise the largest group in gastroenterology practice. Pharmacological therapy of irritable bowel syndrome is disappointing. One treatment strategy for irritable bowel syndrome emphasizes the physician's role; the physician is promoted as the therapeutic modality. Aim: To determine the therapeutic value of the contemporary approach to irritable bowel syndrome by examining health care utilization and patient morbidity. Methods: We performed an observational study over 4 years using an administrative database and morbidity scales. Health care utilization was assessed for 2 years pre- and post-intervention. Patient morbidity was assessed at baseline and 1 and 2 years post-intervention. The participants included 70 irritable bowel syndrome patients referred by primary physicians. A structured consultation was performed, establishing a positive diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome and providing disease conceptualization. Results: Health care utilization for gastrointestinal diagnoses increased in the year prior to the intervention and declined immediately after to baseline; psychiatric and other visits remained unchanged for 4 years. Pain was reduced but other morbidity persisted. Conclusions: A consultation itself is a therapeutic intervention in irritable bowel syndrome with regard to its impact on societal economic burden. It is associated with a durable decrease in illness-specific health care utilization. It may not address all aspects of irritable bowel syndrome: multiple domains of morbidity demonstrated persistent distress.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ilnyckyj, A., Graff, L. A., Blanchard, J. F., & Bernstein, C. N. (2003). Therapeutic value of a gastroenterology consultation in irritable bowel syndrome. Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 17(7), 871–880. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2036.2003.01523.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free