AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews—paper 2: defining complexity, formulating scope, and questions

33Citations
Citations of this article
110Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background The early stages of a systematic review set the scope and expectations. This can be particularly challenging for complex interventions given their multidimensional and dynamic nature. Rationale This paper builds on concepts introduced in paper 1 of this series. It describes the methodological, practical, and philosophical challenges and potential approaches for formulating the questions and scope of systematic reviews of complex interventions. Furthermore, it discusses the use of theory to help organize reviews of complex interventions. Discussion Many interventions in medicine, public health, education, social services, behavioral health, and community programs are complex, and they may not fit neatly within the established paradigm for reviews of straightforward interventions. This paper provides conceptual and operational guidance for these early stages of scope formulation to assist authors of systematic reviews of complex interventions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kelly, M. P., Noyes, J., Kane, R. L., Chang, C., Uhl, S., Robinson, K. A., … Guise, J. M. (2017). AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews—paper 2: defining complexity, formulating scope, and questions. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 90, 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.012

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free