The effects of alternative input devices and repeated exposures on the Test of Basic Aviation Skills (TBAS) performance

Abstract

The use of computer-based, psychomotor testing systems for personnel selection and classification has gained popularity in the civilian and military worlds in recent years. However, several issues need to be resolved before adopting a computerized, psychomotor test. The purpose of this study was to compare the impact of alternative input devices used for the Test Of Basic Aviation Skills (TEAS) as well as to explore the practice effects of the TEAS. In study 1, participants were administered the TBAS tracking tests once with a throttle and once with foot pedals in a classic testretest paradigm. The results confirmed that neither of the input devices provided a significant advantage on TBAS performance. In study 2, participants were administered the TBAS twice with a 24-hour interval between testing. The results demonstrated significant practice effects for all the TBAS subtests except for the dichotic listening tests.