TCT-779 Catheter-directed Thrombolysis vs. Systemic Thrombolysis in Acute PE: A Single Center Experience

  • Fowler J
  • D'Auria S
  • Althouse A
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) for acute pulmonary embolism (PE) has emerged as an alternative to systemic thrombolysis (ST) in patients with massive and submassive PE. ST in patients with submassive PE is effective at reducing PE related morbidity compared to heparin alone, however the net

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fowler, J., D’Auria, S., Althouse, A., McKibben, J., Rivera-Lebron, B., Avgerinos, E., & Toma, C. (2016). TCT-779 Catheter-directed Thrombolysis vs. Systemic Thrombolysis in Acute PE: A Single Center Experience. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 68(18), B315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2016.09.810

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free