Annotating Attribution in the Penn Discourse TreeBank

20Citations
Citations of this article
93Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

An emerging task in text understanding and generation is to categorize information as fact or opinion and to further attribute it to the appropriate source. Corpus annotation schemes aim to encode such distinctions for NLP applications concerned with such tasks, such as information extraction, question answering, summarization, and generation. We describe an annotation scheme for marking the attribution of abstract objects such as propositions, facts and eventualities associated with discourse relations and their arguments annotated in the Penn Discourse TreeBank. The scheme aims to capture the source and degrees of factuality of the abstract objects. Key aspects of the scheme are annotation of the text spans signalling the attribution, and annotation of features recording the source, type, scopal polarity, and determinacy of attribution.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Prasad, R., Dinesh, N., Lee, A., Joshi, A., & Webber, B. (2006). Annotating Attribution in the Penn Discourse TreeBank. In COLING ACL 2006 - Workshop on Sentiment and Subjectivity in Text, Proceedings of the Workshop (pp. 31–38). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.3115/1654641.1654646

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free