Measuring the Quality of Species List Contents

  • Pape T
  • Pyle R
  • Bánki O
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Taxonomic lists, usually of species, have many functions. However, there is currently no reliable and convenient way to determine whether a list contains the information that a user requires other than by reading the list in detail. We therefore developed 24 indicators to characterise list contents. The indicators aim to describe the extent to which the scored list covers their intended class of organisms, the quality of their taxonomic scholarship, and additional information they provide for each taxon. We tested the indicators on 16 lists drawn from a wide range of vertebrates, invertebrates, and plants. A list content score was derived from individual indicator scores after they had been weighted to reflect the preferences that taxonomists had expressed in a global survey. The indicators aim to help list creators provide the details taxonomists and list users consider important. We expect indicators to be refined after public debate..

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pape, T., Pyle, R. L., Bánki, O., Barik, S. K., Berryman, A. J., Bouchard, P., … Garnett, S. T. (2026). Measuring the Quality of Species List Contents. BioScience, 76(3), 269–283. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biaf191

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free