Intercostal Nerve Transfer to Restore Elbow Flexion

  • Wagner E
  • Hundepool C
  • Kircher M
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Hypothesis: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of intercostal nerve transfer to the musculocutaneous motor branch for restoration of elbow flexion. Methods: Over a 10-year period, 85 patients underwent intercostal nerve transfers to the musculocutaneous nerve at a single institution. The average age at surgerywas 30.5 years (17-65), mean BMI 29, with 11 females, and were 18 smokers. All patients had brachial plexus injuries with 19 having C5-C7 avulsions while most had C5-T1 avulsions (n=66). All (n=85) patients had grade 0 biceps strength preoperatively. Patients underwent intercostal nerve (ICN) transfer involving combinations of ICN 3-7 to the musculocutaneous nerve. Fifty-five (65%) patients underwent a simultaneous free gracilis muscle transfer to augment elbow flexion (n=24) or obtain wrist/finger flexion (n=31). Eleven patients had a preexisting arterial (subclavian or axillary) injury. Results: At an average follow-up of 2.8 years (range, 1.0-9.2), 46 (54%) of patients recovered at grade III or better elbow flexion strength. 69 (81%) of patients demonstrated signs of muscle recovery on EMG at last follow-up. The mean elbow flexion was 88 degrees (range, 0-150). The patients DASH scores improved from 48.5 preoperatively to 36.5 postoperatively (P < 0.001), and VAS scores decreased from 5.9 (out of 10) to 4.8 postoperatively (P = 0.03). The number (2, 3, or 4) intercostal nerves used did not have a significant impact on any of the final outcomes. The use of a free muscle transfer improved postoperative elbow flexion strength, with 33 (total n=55, 60%) having greater than or equal to III muscle strength, compared to 12 (total n=30, 40%) of those without a free muscle transfer (P = 0.04). There also were improvements in elbow range of motion (92 vs 78) and EMG signs of recovery (85% vs 70%), but these did not reach statistical significance. Free muscle transfer did significantly improve DASH scores (33 vs 44, P = 0.03). Patients with vascular injuries (n=11) had significantly worse rates of elbow flexion recovery, including worse muscle strengths (P < 0.01), DASH scores (P < 0.01), and rates of EMG recover (P < 0.03). 45/75 (61%) of patients without vascular injuries obtained grade III elbow flexion or greater. Summary Points: * Intercostal nerve transfer in the setting of a complete or near complete brachial plexus injury leads to reasonable rates of recovery of elbow flexion. * Preexisting vascular injuries portend a poor outcome. * In these patients with very limited options, intercostal nerve transfer represents a reasonable nerve transfer option.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wagner, E., Hundepool, C. A., Kircher, M., Spinner, R., Bishop, A., & Shin, A. Y. (2015). Intercostal Nerve Transfer to Restore Elbow Flexion. The Journal of Hand Surgery, 40(9), e12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.06.026

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free