Comparison of three commercial molecular assays for detection of rifampin and isoniazid resistance among Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates in a high-HIV-prevalence setting

9Citations
Citations of this article
54Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In a head-to-head comparison of the MTBDRplus version 2.0 (Hain Lifescience), the Xpert MTB/RIF (Cepheid), and the Anyplex MTB/NTM (Seegene) assays, we demonstrated equal sensitivity (59/61; 96.7%) and specificity (53/54; 98.1%) for detecting rifampin resistance with further analysis of discordances. The Xpert assay does not detect isoniazid resistance while the Anyplex assay showed high false positivity.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Strydom, K., Ismail, F., Matabane, M. M. Z., Onwuegbuna, O., Omar, S. V., & Ismail, N. (2015). Comparison of three commercial molecular assays for detection of rifampin and isoniazid resistance among Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates in a high-HIV-prevalence setting. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 53(9), 3032–3034. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01691-15

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free