Good Teacher Guidance, Whence Academic Efficacy? Parallel Mediating Path of Positive and Negative Academic Emotions in Junior High Students

0Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: To examine the relationships among perceived teacher support, academic emotions, and academic self-efficacy among junior high school students. Methods: A survey was distributed to 376 junior high students, utilizing scales for perceived teacher support, adolescent academic emotions, and self-efficacy. Data analysis included descriptive, correlation, and linear regression methods in SPSS 27.0, with mediation effects assessed using the PROCESS macro. Results: (1) Students’ perceived teacher support significantly and positively predicted academic self-efficacy (β = 0.22, t = 6.07, p < 0.001). (2) positive academic emotions (β = 0.44, t = 10.68, p < 0.001) and negative academic emotions (β = −0.32, t = −8.23, p < 0.001) independently mediated the relationship between perceived teacher support and students’ academic self-efficacy. (3) The mediating effect of positive academic emotions (effect size = 0.21) between perceived teacher support and academic competence self-efficacy was significantly greater than that of negative academic emotions (effect size = 0.05). However, the mediating effects of positive academic emotions (effect size = 0.11) and negative academic emotions (effect size = 0.06) on the relationship between perceived teacher support and academic behavior self-efficacy did not significantly differ. Conclusions: Perceived teacher support directly enhanced academic self-efficacy both directly and indirectly through academic emotions, with positive academic emotions offering a more effective pathway than negative emotions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sun, W., He, D., Dong, B., & Liu, X. (2026). Good Teacher Guidance, Whence Academic Efficacy? Parallel Mediating Path of Positive and Negative Academic Emotions in Junior High Students. Behavioral Sciences, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16030415

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free