Comparative study between anterior and posterior scoring in otoplasty for bat ear

0Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study is meant to compare between anterior and posterior scoring techniques for the correction of prominent ear primarily in terms of cosmesis and patients’ satisfaction. We included 50 patients who were randomly assigned to anterior scoring (AS; 25 subjects with a total of 45 ears) or posterior score (PS; 25 subjects with a total of 47 ears). All patients were subjected to full history taking, general & local examinations and laboratory investigations. We analyzed the age, sex, surgical technique, the need for a second operation, type of anesthetics, additional procedures, follow-up, complications, and results. Both groups were comparable as regard patient characteristics, laterality of prominent ear, intra-operative and follow up measurements and complications. However, posterior scoring results in a high satisfaction rate with low morbidity. It was shown to be safe (low complication rate), simple and reliable intervention. Thus, we advocate posterior scoring during correction of prominent ears deformity.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Abdelazim, M. H., & Ismaeil, W. F. (2018). Comparative study between anterior and posterior scoring in otoplasty for bat ear. Egyptian Journal of Ear, Nose, Throat and Allied Sciences, 19(2), 51–57. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejentas.2018.3486.1011

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free