Genetic Susceptibility to Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Risk for Pancreatic Cancer: Mendelian Randomization

8Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: There are conflicting dataon whether nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is associated with susceptibility to pancreatic cancer. Using Mendelian randomization (MR), we investigated the relationship between genetic predisposition to NAFLD and risk for pancreatic cancer.Methods: Data from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) within the Pancreatic Cancer Cohort Consortium (PanScan; cases n ¼ 5,090, controls n ¼ 8,733) and the Pancreatic Cancer Case Control Consortium (PanC4; cases n ¼ 4,163, controls n ¼ 3,792) were analyzed.Weused dataon68genetic variants with four different MR methods [inverse variance weighting (IVW), MR-Egger, simple median, and penalized weighted median] separatelyto predict genetic heritability of NAFLD. We then assessed the relationship between eachofthe fourMRmethods andpancreatic cancer risk, using logistic regression to calculate ORs and 95% confidence intervals (CI), adjusting for PC risk factors, including obesity and diabetes.Results: No association was found between genetically predicted NAFLD and pancreatic cancer risk in the PanScan or PanC4 samples [e.g., PanScan, IVW OR, 1.04; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.88–1.22; MR-Egger OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.65–1.21; PanC4, IVW OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.90–1.27; MR-Egger OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.67–1.28]. None of the four MR methods indicated an association between genetically predicted NAFLD and pancreatic cancer risk in either sample.Conclusions: Genetic predisposition to NAFLD is not associated with pancreatic cancer risk.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

King, S. D., Veliginti, S., Brouwers, M. C. G. J., Ren, Z., Zheng, W., Setiawan, V. W., … Antwi, S. O. (2023). Genetic Susceptibility to Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Risk for Pancreatic Cancer: Mendelian Randomization. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention, 32(9), 1265–1269. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-23-0453

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free