The Tug-of-War Over Truth: A Foucauldian Case Study on the Interplay of Competing Discourses in Education

2Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The present study applies a Foucauldian critical analytic to investigate competing discourses in education that are shown to be present in one public high school in the southern part of the United States. It is revealed how these discourses intersect and collide with each other to reinforce certain values, principles and practices, but eventually loosely coalesce along with other social interactions into general rules and social norms within the high school. It is found that technology itself represents a separate competing discourse with its own set of unique truths, goals, language and tools that both overlap and challenge other dominant discourses. Foucault’s concepts about power and governmentality provide the deductive design for data interpretation. Teacher and school administrator retellings are examined for signs of structures of thought and discursive truths that characterize ways of thinking that represent opposing points of views about the role of technology in education and its effect on defining the “right” way to teach. A framework is proposed for understanding and comparing the discourses based on their differing views of technology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rose, P. A. (2022). The Tug-of-War Over Truth: A Foucauldian Case Study on the Interplay of Competing Discourses in Education. Frontiers in Education, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.840403

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free