Ventilatory effects of nasal continuous positive airway pressure

9Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) improved arterial oxygenation in patients with sleep apnoea as well as those with acute pulmonary processes such as Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia. Despite an expanding pool of clinical information, little if any attempt seems to have been made to see whether nCPAP alters ventilatory patterns. The effect of nCPAP was assessed by respiratory inductance plethysmography in 14 healthy males. nCPAP reduced respiratory rate (14.3 ± 1.47 to 9.7 ± 1.98, p < 0.0001) but increased tidal volume (0.483 ± 0.090 to 0.602 ± 0.140 l, p = 0.01). Accordingly, minute ventilation decreased (6.91 ± 1.20 to 5.64 ± 0.93 l·min-1, p = 0.0002). Duty cycle (TI/TTOT) decreased from 0.43 ± 0.04 to 0.35 ± 0.05 s during nCPAP (p < 0.0001). Mean inspiratory time and mean expiratory time increased with nCPAP (1.79 ± 0.19 to 2.20 ± 0.41 and 2.44 ± 0.38 to 4.27 ± 1.07 s, respectively, p < 0.02), but there were no significant changes in mean inspiratory flow rate or partitioning of rib cage and abdominal/diaphragmatic contributions to tidal volume. We conclude that nCPAP effects ventilatory pattern in a manner similar to that described for expiratory threshold loading; that is, by decreasing respiratory frequency and minute ventilation. nCPAP does not appear to stimulate healthy subjects to increase their level of ventilation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kesten, S., & Rebuck, A. S. (1990). Ventilatory effects of nasal continuous positive airway pressure. European Respiratory Journal, 3(5), 498–501. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.93.03050498

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free