The concept of 'vulnerability' in research ethics: An in-depth analysis of policies and guidelines

177Citations
Citations of this article
604Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The concept of vulnerability has held a central place in research ethics guidance since its introduction in the United States Belmont Report in 1979. It signals mindfulness for researchers and research ethics boards to the possibility that some participants may be at higher risk of harm or wrong. Despite its important intended purpose and widespread use, there is considerable disagreement in the scholarly literature about the meaning and delineation of vulnerability, stemming from a perceived lack of guidance within research ethics standards. The aim of this study was to assess the concept of vulnerability as it is employed in major national and international research ethics policies and guidelines. Methods: We conducted an in-depth analysis of 11 (five national and six international) research ethics policies and guidelines, exploring their discussions of the definition, application, normative justification and implications of vulnerability. Results: Few policies and guidelines explicitly defined vulnerability, instead relying on implicit assumptions and the delineation of vulnerable groups and sources of vulnerability. On the whole, we found considerable richness in the content on vulnerability across policies, but note that this relies heavily on the structure imposed on the data through our analysis. Conclusions: Our results underscore a need for policymakers to revisit the guidance on vulnerability in research ethics, and we propose that a process of stakeholder engagement would well-support this effort.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bracken-Roche, D., Bell, E., Macdonald, M. E., & Racine, E. (2017). The concept of “vulnerability” in research ethics: An in-depth analysis of policies and guidelines. Health Research Policy and Systems, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-016-0164-6

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 258

74%

Researcher 53

15%

Professor / Associate Prof. 19

5%

Lecturer / Post doc 19

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 86

34%

Medicine and Dentistry 86

34%

Nursing and Health Professions 59

23%

Business, Management and Accounting 25

10%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free