Bias and Groupthink in Science’s Peer-Review System

14Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Studies have shown that various types of biases can impact scientific peer review. These biases may contribute to a type of groupthink that can make it difficult to obtain funding or publish innovative or controversial research. The desire to achieve consensus and uniformity within a research group or scientific discipline can make it difficult for individuals to contradict the status quo. This chapter reviews the scientific literature regarding biases in the peer-review system, reflects on the potential impact of bias, and discusses approaches to minimize or control bias in peer review.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Resnik, D. B., & Smith, E. M. (2020). Bias and Groupthink in Science’s Peer-Review System. In Groupthink in Science: Greed, Pathological Altruism, Ideology, Competition, and Culture (pp. 99–113). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36822-7_9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free