Growth patterns by birth size of preterm children born at 24–29 gestational weeks for the first 3 years

23Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Concerns are prevalent about preterm infant long-term growth regarding plotting low on growth charts at discharge, stunting, underweight, high body fat and subsequent cardiometabolic morbidities. Objectives: To examine (a) longitudinal growth patterns of extremely and very preterm infants to 3 years corrected age (CA) (outcome), categorised by their birthweight for gestational age: small, appropriate and large for gestational age (SGA, AGA and LGA, respectively) (exposure); and (b) the ability of growth faltering ( <30 weeks and < 1500 g, who had dietitian and multi-disciplinary support before and after discharge, were plotted against the World Health Organization growth standard. Infants with brain injuries, necrotising enterocolitis and bronchopulmonary dysplasia were excluded. Results: Of the included 405 infants, the proportions of infants with anthropometric measures > − 2 z-scores improved with age. The highest proportions <6%). After zero months CA, high weight-4-length and body mass index > + 2 z-scores were rare (2.1% at 3 years CA). Those born SGA had higher proportions with shorter heights (16.7% vs. 5.2%) and lower weights (27.8% vs. 3.5%) at 3 years CA compared to those born AGA. The ability of growth faltering to predict cognitive scores was limited (AUROC 0.42, 95% CI 0.39, 0.45 to 0.52, 95% CI 0.41, 0.63). Conclusions: Although children born <30 weeks gestation without major neonatal morbidities plot low on growth charts at 36 weeks CA most catch up to growth chart curves by 3 years CA.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fenton, T. R., Samycia, L., Elmrayed, S., Nasser, R., & Alshaikh, B. (2024). Growth patterns by birth size of preterm children born at 24–29 gestational weeks for the first 3 years. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 38(7), 560–569. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppe.13081

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free