Retrospective Analysis of a Real-Life Use of Tixagevimab–Cilgavimab plus SARS-CoV-2 Antivirals for Treatment of COVID-19

1Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Tixagevimab–cilgavimab is effective for the treatment of early COVID-19 in outpatients with risk factors for progression to severe illness, as well as for primary prevention and post-exposure prophylaxis. We aimed to retrospectively evaluate the hospital stay (expressed in days), prognosis, and negativity rate for COVID-19 in patients after treatment with tixagevimab–cilgavimab. We enrolled 42 patients who were nasal swab-positive for SARS-CoV-2 (antigenic and molecular)—both vaccinated and not vaccinated for COVID-19—hospitalized at the first division of the Cotugno Hospital in Naples who had received a single intramuscular dose of tixagevimab–cilgavimab (300 mg/300 mg). All patient candidates for tixagevimab–cilgavimab had immunocompromised immune systems either due to chronic degenerative disorders (Group A: 27 patients) or oncohematological diseases (Group B: 15 patients). Patients enrolled in group A came under our observation after 10 days of clinical symptoms and 5 days after testing positivite for COVID-19, unlike the other patients enrolled in the study. The mean stay in hospital for the patients in Group A was 21 ± 5 days vs. 25 ± 5 days in Group B. Twenty patients tested negative after a median hospitalization stay of 16 days (IQR: 18–15.25); of them, five (25%) patients belonged to group B. Therefore, patients with active hematological malignancy had a lower negativization rate when treated 10 days after the onset of clinical symptoms and five days after their first COVID-19 positive nasal swab.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Capoluongo, N., Mascolo, A., Bernardi, F. F., Sarno, M., Mattera, V., di Flumeri, G., … Perrella, A. (2023). Retrospective Analysis of a Real-Life Use of Tixagevimab–Cilgavimab plus SARS-CoV-2 Antivirals for Treatment of COVID-19. Pharmaceuticals, 16(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16101493

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free