Evaluation of protection by two endotoxin-neutralizing IgM monoclonal antibodies in different peritonitis models

2Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Two anti-core glycolipid (CGL) IgM monoclonal antibodies (mAbs 8-2 and 26-20), previously shown to display cross-reactivity with heterologous lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in vitro and to provide cross-protectivity against endotoxin challenge in vivo, were evaluated for their potential to protect mice against death from peritonitis caused by heterologous bacterial challenge. Without concurrent antibiotic treatment neither antibody was protective. Compared with a control mAb, prophylactic treatment with mAb 8-2 significantly increased the survival of gentamicin-treated mice challenged with the rough strain Salmonella minnesota Re595. Both mAb 8-2 and a control mAb, in combination with a suboptimal dose of ceftazidime, increased survival following challenge with the clinical isolate Escherichia coli 07:K1. In a model of mucin-enhanced peritonitis, neither mAb was protective against challenge with inocula of E. coli 07:K1, ranging from 102 to 104 bacteria. We conclude that protection of mice by anti-CGL mAb 8-2 against heterologous challenge is vitally dependent on concurrent treatment with antibiotics and that protection may not be attributable to the anti-CGL specificity of these antibodies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hustinx, W. N. M., Benaissa-Trouw, B. J., Harmsen, T., Klein, S., Verhoef, J., Hoepelman, A. I. M., & Kraaijeveld, K. (1997). Evaluation of protection by two endotoxin-neutralizing IgM monoclonal antibodies in different peritonitis models. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 40(4), 567–572. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/40.4.567

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free