Evidence-based guidelines: Improving AGREEment on consistence evaluation

2Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Modern clinical practice relies on evidence-based medicine (EBM) and evidence-based guidelines (EBGs). The critical evaluation of EBGs value is therefore an essential step to further improve clinical practice. In our opinion, correlating levels of evidence and grades of recommendation can be an easy tool to quickly display internal consistence of EBGs. © 2012 Elsevier GmbH.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vincenzi, B., Napolitano, A., Santini, D., Maiello, E., Torri, V., & Tonini, G. (2012). Evidence-based guidelines: Improving AGREEment on consistence evaluation. Journal of Bone Oncology, 1(1), 30–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbo.2012.04.001

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free