Epidural 0.2% ropivacaine for labour analgesia: Parturient-controlled or continuous infusion?

46Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In this randomized, open study, we compared the incidence of lower limb motor block associated with epidural labour analgesia provided by parturient-controlled method (PCEA) with continuous infusion (CIEA) using 0.2% ropivacaine. The PCEA group (n = 20) received a demand-only regimen (bolus 5 ml, lockout 15 minutes). The rate of infusion of the CIEA group (n = 20) was 8 ml/h. We found that pain relief was not significantly different between the two groups, although the PCEA group had a higher satisfaction score (P < 0.05). Fewer parturients in the PCEA group had lower limb motor block (6 vs 14, P < 0.05). The total volume of ropivacaine used per hour was also lower in the PCEA group (median 8.75 vs 10.5 ml, P < 0.05). No difference in the maternal or fetal outcome was detected. We conclude that PCEA with ropivacaine is an effective mode of analgesia which is dose-sparing and produces less motor block in comparison with CIEA.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sia, A. T., & Chong, J. L. (1999). Epidural 0.2% ropivacaine for labour analgesia: Parturient-controlled or continuous infusion? Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, 27(2), 154–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057x9902700204

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free