Purpose of reviewMultiple myeloma is a disease of elderly adults. Improvement in survival has occurred because of biological insights and novel agents. Therapeutic options involve choices today, thus have become more complex. Demographics have led to an increased number of elderly patients and age may be associated with a poorer outcome but is not the only prognostic predictor today.Recent findingsTo evaluate patients' health status rather than their chronological age alone, frailty scores and functional geriatric assessments are used to identify prognostic groups, avoid adverse events, compare clinical trials and tailor treatment. As most clinical trials exclude frail elderly patients, those enrolled therein are often younger and healthier than the typical multiple myeloma patient. This represents a challenge for frail cohorts because of their increased risk of adverse events, overtreatment and undertreatment and/or therapy discontinuation, which may lead to poorer survival and quality of life (QoL). Reassessing patients' status via geriatric assessments is also relevant during treatment to adjust interventions appropriately.SummaryIntegrating geriatric assessments may lead to individual treatment decisions, dose adjustments, better clinical outcome and QoL. Prospective clinical trials that enroll elderly multiple myeloma patients with comorbidities, incorporate frailty scores/geriatric assessments and help with prognostication, adverse event avoidance and QoL maintenance, remain warranted.
CITATION STYLE
Möller, M. D., Gengenbach, L., Graziani, G., Greil, C., Wäsch, R., & Engelhardt, M. (2021, November 1). Geriatric assessments and frailty scores in multiple myeloma patients: A needed tool for individualized treatment? Current Opinion in Oncology. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCO.0000000000000792
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.