This chapter seeks to provide insight into the ways in which Member States leveraged the regulatory discretion afforded to them by the GDPR. Specifically, it reviews the biobank regulatory environment; whether and how derogations under Article 89(2) GDPR are enabled; the legal basis for scientific research and the role of consent in biobanking post-GDPR; the balance between individual rights and public interest in national law; and finally, the GDPR’s impact and future possibilities for biobanking. In exercising self-determination, Member States can, to a certain extent, align data protection requirements with their values and aspirations. Such alignment, though, could jeopardize collaborative research. In light of the need to bridge divergent legal and ethical requirements at a national and supranational level, the role of Research Ethics Committees (RECs) might prove to be essential.
CITATION STYLE
Tzortzatou, O., Slokenberga, S., Reichel, J., da Costa Andrade, A., Barbosa, C., Bekaert, S., … Vella Falzon, R. (2021). Biobanking Across Europe Post-GDPR: A Deliberately Fragmented Landscape. In Law, Governance and Technology Series (Vol. 43, pp. 397–419). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49388-2_22
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.