Four commercial brands of chemically activated acrylic resin were compared through photoelastic analysis. Photoelastic resin blocks were made with 2 implants placed parallel to each other and 2 square transfer copings splinted. Both transfers were splinted with chemically activated acrylic resin: Dencrilay, Duralay I, Duralay II, and GC. Data were analyzed by 2-way analysis of variance and Tukey test (P < .05). Statistically significant differences were found among the 3 brands of chemically activated acrylic resin. Dencrilay showed greater dimensional alteration. Duralay I and GC are recommended for the transfer of the position of the multi-implants.
CITATION STYLE
Lopes-Júnior, I., Lucas, B. D. L., Gomide, H. A., & Gomes, V. L. (2013). Impression techniques for multiple implants: A photoelastic analysis. Part II: Comparison of four acrylic resins. Journal of Oral Implantology, 39(5), 545–549. https://doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00041
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.