Impression techniques for multiple implants: A photoelastic analysis. Part II: Comparison of four acrylic resins

4Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Four commercial brands of chemically activated acrylic resin were compared through photoelastic analysis. Photoelastic resin blocks were made with 2 implants placed parallel to each other and 2 square transfer copings splinted. Both transfers were splinted with chemically activated acrylic resin: Dencrilay, Duralay I, Duralay II, and GC. Data were analyzed by 2-way analysis of variance and Tukey test (P < .05). Statistically significant differences were found among the 3 brands of chemically activated acrylic resin. Dencrilay showed greater dimensional alteration. Duralay I and GC are recommended for the transfer of the position of the multi-implants.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lopes-Júnior, I., Lucas, B. D. L., Gomide, H. A., & Gomes, V. L. (2013). Impression techniques for multiple implants: A photoelastic analysis. Part II: Comparison of four acrylic resins. Journal of Oral Implantology, 39(5), 545–549. https://doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00041

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free