Clinical evaluation and cost analysis of great basin Shiga toxin direct molecular assay for detection of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in diarrheal stool specimens

6Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The Shiga Toxin Direct molecular assay (ST Direct) relies on nucleic acid amplification and solid array-based amplicon detection to identify Shiga toxinproducing Escherichia coli (STEC) in preserved stool specimens. Genes encoding Shiga toxin (stx1 and stx2), as well as the E. Coli serotype O:157-specific marker rfbE, are simultaneously detected within 2 h. ST Direct was evaluated using 1,084 prospectively collected preserved stool specimens across five clinical centers. An additional 55 retrospectively collected, frozen specimens were included to increase the number of positive specimens evaluated. Results were compared to results from routine culture and an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) specific for the recovery and identification of STEC. ST Direct was found to be 93.2% sensitive and 99.3% specific for detection of stx1 and stx2 and 95.7% sensitive and 99.3% specific for detection of E. Coli serotype O:157. All specimens with false-positive results were found to contain stx1 or stx2 or were found to be positive for serotype O:157 when analyzed using alternative molecular methods. All 4 false-negative stx1 or stx2 results were reported for frozen, retrospectively tested specimens. In all cases, the specimens tested positive for stx by an alternative FDA-cleared nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) but were negative for stx1 and stx2 following nucleic acid sequence analysis. Based on these data, culture and EIA-based methods for detection of STEC are only 33% sensitive compared to molecular tests. A retrospective cost analysis demonstrated 59% of the cost of routine stool culture to be attributable to the identification of STEC. Taken together, these data suggest that ST Direct may provide a costeffective, rapid molecular alternative to routine culture for the identification of STEC in preserved stool specimens.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Faron, M. L., Ledeboer, N. A., Connolly, J., Granato, P. A., Alkins, B. R., Bard, J. D., … Buchan, B. W. (2017). Clinical evaluation and cost analysis of great basin Shiga toxin direct molecular assay for detection of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in diarrheal stool specimens. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 55(2), 519–525. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01939-16

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free