MOS, perfect prog, and reanalysis

46Citations
Citations of this article
70Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Statistical postprocessing methods have been successful in correcting many defects inherent in numerical weather prediction model forecasts. Among them, model output statistics (MOS) and perfect prog have been most common, each with its own strengths and weaknesses. Here, an alternative method (called RAN) is examined that combines the two, while at the same time utilizes the information in reanalysis data. The three methods are examined from a purely formal/mathematical point of view. The results suggest that whereas MOS is expected to outperform perfect prog and RAN in terms of mean squared error, bias, and error variance, the RAN approach is expected to yield more certain and bias-free forecasts. It is suggested therefore that a real-time RAN-based postprocessor be developed for further testing. © 2006 American Meteorological Society.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Marzban, C., Sandgathe, S., & Kalnay, E. (2006). MOS, perfect prog, and reanalysis. Monthly Weather Review, 134(2), 657–663. https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR3088.1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free