Not Noble Savages After All: Limits to Early Altruism

36Citations
Citations of this article
159Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Many scholars draw on evidence from evolutionary biology, behavioral economics, and infant research to argue that humans are “noble savages,” endowed with indiscriminate kindness. We believe this is mistaken. While there is evidence for an early-emerging moral sense—even infants recognize and favor instances of fairness and kindness among third parties—altruistic behaviors are selective from the start. Babies and young children favor people who have been kind to them in the past and favor familiar individuals over strangers. They hold strong biases for in-group over out-group members and for themselves over others, and indeed are more unequivocally selfish than older children and adults. Much of what is most impressive about adult morality arises not through inborn capacities but through a fraught developmental process that involves exposure to culture and the exercise of rationality.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wynn, K., Bloom, P., Jordan, A., Marshall, J., & Sheskin, M. (2018). Not Noble Savages After All: Limits to Early Altruism. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(1), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417734875

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free