Comparison between the efficiency of L.M.D and E.M.D algorithms for early detection of gear defects

18Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In recent years, the adaptive decomposition methods have become the center of interest of researchers in many fields and especially in the vibration diagnosis of rotating machines. This paper compares the sensitivity of defect detection of two adaptive methods: local mean decomposition (L.M.D) and empirical mode decomposition (E.M.D). The efficiency of L.M.D and E.M.D methods for detecting defects is investigated for two cases, one from numerical signals and the other from signals recorded during a fatigue test on gear bench. The time descriptors Kurtosis, Thalaf and Thikat are applied on the signal and on its Hilbert transform. The results reveal that both techniques seem to be suitable and have good efficiency for the fault detection. From experimental signals, the comparative results reveal that both methods allow for monitoring wear, but that L.M.D is more sensitive to detect rapid changes of degradation than E.M.D method for the considered case. Consequently these features have potential to become powerful tools for the monitoring of rotating machinery. © AFM, EDP Sciences 2013.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Thameur, K., Marc, T., Raynald, G., & Mohamed, E. B. (2013). Comparison between the efficiency of L.M.D and E.M.D algorithms for early detection of gear defects. Mechanics and Industry, 14(2), 121–127. https://doi.org/10.1051/meca/2012037

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free