Analysis of consumers’ negative perceptions of health tracking in insurance – a value sacrifice approach

11Citations
Citations of this article
76Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: This paper explores and identifies customer-value-related sacrifices that consumers attach to interactive health/life insurance. This paper aims to increase understanding of why individual consumers are not willing to embrace behaviour-tracking-based insurance applications. Design/methodology/approach: The authors analysed data from a qualitative survey of Finnish insurance consumers who were not keen on adopting interactive insurance products. Findings: Developed through thematic analysis, the framework presented in this paper illustrates consumers’ value sacrifices on four dimensions: economic, functional, emotional and symbolic value. Research limitations/implications: The framework and insights emerging in the study hold several implications related to increased understanding of consumers’ perceptions of insurance and to developing interactive insurance services. In addition, this work provides a promising foundation and avenues for further considerations related to digital ethics in insurance. Originality/value: To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this paper is the first piece applying a value sacrifice perspective in studying consumers’ unwillingness to adopt interactive insurance products.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Talonen, A., Mähönen, J., Koskinen, L., & Kuoppakangas, P. (2021). Analysis of consumers’ negative perceptions of health tracking in insurance – a value sacrifice approach. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 19(4), 463–479. https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-05-2020-0061

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free