Maximally efficient two-stage screening: Determining intellectual disability in taiwanese military conscripts

6Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to apply a two-stage screening method for the large-scale intelligence screening of military conscripts. Methods: We collected 99 conscripted soldiers whose educational levels were senior high school level or lower to be the participants. Every participant was required to take the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) and the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised (WAIS-R) assessments. Results: Logistic regression analysis showed the conceptual level responses (CLR) index of the WCST was the most significant index for determining intellectual disability (ID; FIQ < 84). We used the receiver operating characteristic curve to determine the optimum cut-off point of CLR. The optimum one cut-off point of CLR was 66; the two cut-off points were 49 and 66. Comparing the two-stage window screening with the two-stage positive screening, the area under the curve and the positive predictive value increased. Moreover, the cost of the two-stage window screening decreased by 59%. Conclusion: The two-stage window screening is more accurate and economical than the two-stage positive screening. Our results provide an example for the use of two-stage screening and the possibility of the WCST to replace WAIS-R in large-scale screenings for ID in the future.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chien, C. C., Huang, S. F., & Lung, F. W. (2009). Maximally efficient two-stage screening: Determining intellectual disability in taiwanese military conscripts. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 2, 39–44. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S4817

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free