Roads less traveled: understanding the “why” in simulation as an integrated continuing professional development activity

  • Tavares W
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The simulation community has experienced significant advances, strengthening the case for the use of simulation in medical education toward improving patient outcomes. However, an underlying assumption particularly regarding utilization of simulation by those who are in practice, is that simulation will be selected as a continuing professional development (CPD) strategy. Exploring reasons for choices of educational formats, particularly regarding simulation, is poorly integrated into CPD research. Discussion: Despite significant advances the scientific simulation community has been slow to produce evidence regarding why practitioners may be reserved in engaging in simulation or not. Using examples from related education contexts the author attempts to bridge simulation science, CPD and less commonly used theoretical frameworks to address this issue. The author argues that theoretical perspectives that recognize the use of simulation for CPD as a socio-personal process and/or a personal or group issue (e.g., theories of intelligence, self-determination theory, theory of planned behavior, social identity theory) and that are conceptually distinct from educational mechanisms/ provision are necessary to advance simulation use in CPD contexts.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tavares, W. (2019). Roads less traveled: understanding the “why” in simulation as an integrated continuing professional development activity. Advances in Simulation, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-019-0111-z

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free