Understanding theodicy and anthropodicy in the perspective of Job and its implications for human suffering

1Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Suffering is often experienced by those who obey God, while happiness is experienced by those who do not know God. This study aims to re-examine theodicy about disasters and calamities and tries to provide alternative thoughts regarding the relationship between God, accidents and humans, based on the story of Job. This research methodology is a qualitative approach through library research, by reading books and journals and investigating related books. Hermeneutic principles are also used to understand the meaning of the signs and symbols in the text. The results of this study indicate that the concept of anthropodicy stands as a complement to the idea of theodicy, which can help humans-especially believers-to understand the meaning of suffering and their vocation in a world full of uncertainty while still having faith in God, who is sovereign over all. Contribution: This article contributes to providing an understanding of anthropodicy from Job’s perspective, so that humans see suffering as God’s sovereignty and as something that God allows in order to see God’s omnipotence.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Daliman, M., Suparti, H., Gumelar, F., Tari, E., & Wijaya, H. (2022). Understanding theodicy and anthropodicy in the perspective of Job and its implications for human suffering. HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies, 78(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/HTS.V78I1.7679

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free