A Randomized Trial of Valved Vs Nonvalved Implantable Ports for Vascular Access

  • Lamont J
  • Mccarty T
  • Stephens J
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Vascular access devices placed into the central venous system are used routinely in the medical management of many patients. Catheter tip occlusion is a common complication of open-ended catheters, causing difficulty with blood withdrawal and infusion. This study evaluated whether a valved subcutaneous port system would have fewer associated complications than a standard nonvalved port.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lamont, J. P., Mccarty, T. M., Stephens, J. S., Smith, B. A., Carlo, J., Livingston, S., & Kuhn, J. A. (2003). A Randomized Trial of Valved Vs Nonvalved Implantable Ports for Vascular Access. Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings, 16(4), 384–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/08998280.2003.11927932

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free